Are Dental Students Losing Crucial Basic Science Knowledge?
The key to becoming a skilled dentist lies not just in clinical practice, but in the foundational sciences learned during the first years of training. Yet, evidence suggests this crucial knowledge is slipping away.
Imagine an architect trying to design a building without understanding the principles of physics and materials science. Similarly, a dentist's ability to diagnose complex oral diseases, manage medical emergencies, and develop effective treatment plans is deeply rooted in their understanding of basic sciences like anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry.
However, research reveals a concerning trend: as dental students progress through their education and into clinical practice, their retention of this foundational knowledge significantly declines. This article explores the phenomenon of knowledge loss in dental education, its implications for patient care, and the innovative strategies educators are employing to bridge this gap.
Basic medical sciences form the fundamental language of dentistry
They are the critical link between a symptom and a diagnosis, the blueprint that explains why a particular treatment works 1 .
Oral diseases are increasingly linked to prevalent conditions like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cognitive decline. A strong grasp of basic sciences allows dentists to understand these connections and provide holistic care 1 .
Medical emergencies, such as vasovagal syncope, angina, or anaphylaxis, can occur in a dental practice. Recognizing these situations and acting effectively requires underlying knowledge of physiology and pharmacology 1 .
The development of new, durable, and aesthetic biomaterials for composites and adhesives relies on a deep understanding of physics and biochemistry 1 .
Research is now uncovering genetic predispositions to conditions like periodontal disease and tooth erosion. Understanding these genetic mechanisms is key to future personalized dental care strategies 1 .
The loss of basic science knowledge over time is not just anecdotal; it is a well-documented phenomenon in medical and dental education. Studies show that as students move from preclinical to clinical training, their focus shifts, and without continuous reinforcement, core scientific concepts fade.
The learning process in dental education is a constant battle against the "forgetting curve"—a psychological theory highlighting how newly acquired knowledge rapidly declines without timely reinforcement 2 . The traditional dental curriculum, where basic sciences are taught almost exclusively in the first two years and then abandoned for clinical training, exacerbates this natural forgetting 1 .
To combat this, educators are advocating for vertical integration, a strategy that blends basic and clinical sciences throughout the entire undergraduate program. This approach maintains a focus on foundational principles during clinical years, helping students see their direct relevance and improving long-term retention 1 2 .
Drop in physiology & biochemistry knowledge among clinical vs. preclinical medical students 3
Reduction in skull anatomy knowledge from second to fifth year dental students 4
Visual representation of knowledge retention decline without reinforcement 2
A compelling 2025 study conducted at the University of Oslo provides a stark visual representation of this knowledge loss, specifically in the critical area of skull anatomy 4 .
Researchers designed a study to evaluate the retention of osteological knowledge—the anatomy of the skull bones, which is essential for procedures like anesthesia, surgery, and reading radiographs 4 . They tested three distinct groups:
Recently completed their anatomy course
In their final clinical year
Qualified dentists specializing in various fields
Each participant was given four individual skull bones and a complete cranium, with specific anatomical structures marked. Their task was to independently identify these structures within a time limit 4 .
The results revealed a dramatic drop in knowledge retention from the second to the fifth year.
| Student Group | Mandible | Maxilla | Sphenoid Bone | Temporal Bone | Complete Cranium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second Year | >90% | >90% | >90% | >90% | 85.9% |
| Fifth Year | 48.3% | <50% | <50% | <50% | 20.8% |
| Postgraduates | Varies by specialty | Varies by specialty | As low as 11.8% | Varies by specialty | Varies by specialty |
Table 1: Retention of Skull Anatomy Knowledge Across Dental Education 4
The analysis showed that second-year students significantly outperformed both fifth-year students and practicing dentists 4 . This indicates that core anatomical knowledge is rapidly lost once students enter the clinical phase of their training. Interestingly, knowledge was better retained for structures with clear clinical or radiological relevance, and specialists in fields like oral surgery showed higher accuracy in their area of expertise 4 .
The challenge of knowledge retention extends far beyond anatomy. A longitudinal study at the University of Mississippi Medical Center tracked dental students' knowledge of core periodontal concepts over three years. They found that test scores dropped during gaps between courses but rebounded—and even improved—with repeated, progressive instruction 2 .
Strong positive correlation (r = 0.87) between knowledge and confidence 2
The evidence is clear: the traditional model of teaching basic sciences in isolation at the beginning of dental school is insufficient for creating lifelong learners and experts. The steep decline in knowledge retention, as seen in the skull anatomy study, is a call to action 4 .
The path forward lies in curricular transformation. By embracing vertically integrated curricula, employing spaced repetition, and relentlessly demonstrating the clinical relevance of every scientific principle, dental educators can help students build a more durable and accessible knowledge foundation 1 2 4 .
Repeatedly reinforcing key concepts at strategic intervals throughout the curriculum 2 .
Explicitly linking basic science concepts to clinical cases and procedures 4 .
Using virtual reality, AI, and online learning tools to create engaging review experiences 5 .
This is not just about helping students pass exams. It is about fostering a deeper understanding that will ultimately lead to more accurate diagnoses, innovative treatments, and better patient care for years to come. The future of dentistry depends not on forgetting its foundation, but on building upon it.
References will be added here manually.