The Discovery That Saved Thousands of Lives
In the history of science, there are discoveries that not only expand the boundaries of knowledge but also save human lives. One such discovery is the concept of natural focality of infectious diseases, developed by Soviet scientist Evgeny Nikanorovich Pavlovsky. This theory, born in the anxious pre-war years, still forms the basis for the prevention and control of many dangerous diseases worldwide. On May 29, 1939, at the General Meeting of the USSR Academy of Sciences, a report was presented that forever changed our understanding of how infections persist in nature and are transmitted to humans.
Today, in the era of pandemics and global environmental changes, Pavlovsky's ideas are particularly relevant. Understanding the natural mechanisms of pathogen circulation helps predict and prevent disease outbreaks that could threaten humanity.
Natural focality is a characteristic of certain diseases where their pathogens, specific vectors, and animal reservoirs can exist indefinitely in natural conditions regardless of human habitation1 . Humans become infected only when they enter the territory of such a natural focus.
Pavlovsky's key idea was that pathogens circulate in nature through specific food chains, primarily between wild animals and blood-sucking arthropods. For example, ticks infected from sick animals transmit the infection to healthy individuals through blood feeding. Thus, the pathogen circulates along the chain: animal â vector â animal1 .
The structure of a natural focus includes five main components6 :
Disease-causing agent
Source of the pathogen
Transmitter of the pathogen
Receives the pathogen
Enable pathogen circulation
Pavlovsky introduced the concept of "pathobiocenosis" - a biocenosis of a specific species composition, which includes the pathogen as one of its obligatory members. He distinguished between "closed" and "open" pathobiocenoses. In closed ones (characteristic of obligate vector-borne infections), the pathogen sequentially moves from the vertebrate organism to the arthropod organism and back. In open ones, the pathogen can move into the external environment (soil, water), where it persists for a certain time6 .
Transmission Type | Characteristics | Disease Examples |
---|---|---|
Obligate Vector-Borne | Transmission exclusively through vectors | Tick-borne encephalitis, tick-borne rickettsiosis, Japanese encephalitis |
Facultative Vector-Borne | Possible transmission both through vectors and other routes | Plague, tularemia, Q fever |
Non-Vector Zoonoses | Transmission without vector participation | Leptospirosis, pseudotuberculosis |
The historical context of the discovery of natural focality is unique. In 1937-1940, under conditions of increasing military threat in the Far East, the Soviet government faced a serious problem: Japanese militarists were actively developing and testing biological weapons4 . The Kwantung Army had created an extensive system of biological laboratories where pathogens for humans, agricultural animals, and plants were developed4 .
In response to this threat, the Complex Far Eastern Expedition of Special Purpose of the People's Commissariat of Health of the USSR began working in the region, initially headed by Lev Alexandrovich Zilber and later by Evgeny Nikanorovich Pavlovsky4 . Scientists had to unravel the mechanisms of spread of unknown diseases that were claiming the lives of military personnel and local residents in the shortest possible time.
Field research in challenging conditions was essential to understanding disease transmission patterns.
The research methodology included several stages:
Analysis of disease cases, their distribution across territory and time.
Investigation of vector fauna and animal hosts in various landscapes.
Isolation and identification of pathogens, study of their biological properties.
Reproduction of pathogen transmission processes under controlled conditions.
A decisive breakthrough occurred in the study of tick-borne encephalitis. Scientists established that:
This observation allowed not only the development of effective protective measures (treatment regimen using immune sera and a vaccine) but also the formulation of the general theory of natural focality of infectious diseases4 .
Research Direction | Before Expedition | After Expedition |
---|---|---|
Understanding Transmission Mechanism | Unknown | Established vector-borne transmission through ticks |
Preventive Measures | None | Developed specific sera and vaccines |
Population Protection Tactics | Random, non-systematic | Targeted: repellents, protective clothing, vaccination |
Scientific Basis | None | Created theory of natural focality |
Researchers of natural focal infections in the 1930s used relatively simple but effective methods and tools. They did not have modern molecular biological technologies at their disposal, but careful observation, a systematic approach, and meticulous analysis allowed them to make fundamental discoveries.
Tool/Method | Purpose | Example of Use |
---|---|---|
Entomological Collections | Collection and study of blood-sucking arthropods | Collecting ticks in natural biotopes to identify vectors |
Dissection and Microscopy | Study of internal structure of vectors and detection of pathogens | Detection of borrelia in ticks of the genus Ornithodorus |
Experimental Infection | Study of pathogen transmission mechanisms | Infection of laboratory animals to study pathogenesis |
Mapping | Identification of connection between foci and specific landscapes | Creating maps of disease distribution |
Statistical Analysis | Identification of patterns in disease distribution | Analysis of seasonality and territorial distribution of cases |
One of the key objects of Pavlovsky's early research were argasid ticks of the genus Ornithodorus - vectors of the causative agent of tick-borne relapsing fever (Central Asian borreliosis). Studying these ticks, the scientist proved not only the possibility of horizontal transmission of the pathogen (from tick to human or animal and back) but also vertical transmission - through generations of the vector via transovarial and transstadial transmission. This explained how infection could persist in nature for a long time without the constant presence of vertebrate hosts.
Laboratory analysis using microscopy was crucial for identifying pathogens in vectors.
The discovery of natural focality had not only theoretical but also enormous practical significance. It allowed the development of effective control measures against dangerous diseases: vaccination, wearing protective clothing, using repellents, destruction of rodents (deratization) and vectors (disinsection) in disease foci1 .
A strict association of natural foci with specific types of landscape was established. For example, the taiga of Siberia is characterized by foci of tick-borne rickettsioses, while the deserts of Central Asia are characterized by cutaneous leishmaniasis and tick-borne spirochetosis1 . This made it possible to predict the risk of infection in various territories and conduct targeted preventive measures.
According to Pavlovsky's classification, natural focal diseases include: plague, tularemia, tick-borne and Japanese encephalitis, rabies, leptospirosis, cutaneous leishmaniasis, tick-borne relapsing fever, some helminthiases (opisthorchiasis, trichinellosis) and many others1 .
The modern development of the concept of natural focality continues. In 2025, significant scientific events dedicated to this topic took place in Russia:
In September 2025, Saratov hosted the III School of Young Scientists "Volzhsky Vetorok" on the topic "Natural focality of infectious diseases. Evolution of views"3 .
The Congress with international participation "Epidemiology - 2025" (October 2025) is planned, where one of the main topics will be "Epidemiology and molecular diagnostics of natural focal and zoonotic infections"2 .
In October 2025, the V Anniversary Conference "Pokrovskie Readings" will take place with a section dedicated to natural focal and especially dangerous infections5 .
These events testify that Pavlovsky's teaching continues to develop, integrating modern technologies - genomic epidemiological surveillance, digital modeling, molecular diagnostics2 3 .
The concept of natural focality, born 85 years ago in the difficult conditions of the Far Eastern expedition, continues to remain a relevant scientific direction. It formed the basis of the Federal Program "Sanitary Shield of Russia", ensuring the country's biological safety4 .
Pavlovsky's discovery reminds us that humans are part of a complex ecological system, and many threats to our health circulate in nature independently of us. Understanding these patterns is key to preventing future epidemics and pandemics.
As Professor Rudakov noted in 2014, on the 75th anniversary of the theory: "The further development of the doctrine of natural focality has shown that it has not only medical but also general biological significance. It served and serves as a key to revealing the origin and evolution of many diseases with natural focality and has received worldwide recognition"6 .
And today, when humanity faces new challenges - from climate change to the emergence of previously unknown infections - Pavlovsky's ideas continue to guide scientists in search of answers to the most pressing questions of epidemiological safety.
Pathogens circulate in nature through specific food chains between wild animals and blood-sucking arthropods.
The concept of natural focality, developed in 1939, continues to inform modern epidemiological practices worldwide.